lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MebEY8wAeNpcXwgi_OaTwwYaqxqWZ6XZRoCRPZvS-724A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 22:34:33 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce proper interrupt handling

On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:46 PM Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bart,
>
> I was just wondering what is the status for this series of patches?
>
> Thank you.
> Asmaa
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 2:01 PM
> To: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>; open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>; netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>; Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>; David S . Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Rafael J . Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>; David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] gpio: mlxbf2: Introduce proper interrupt handling
> Importance: High
>
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:48 PM Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a follow up on a discussion regarding proper handling of GPIO
> > interrupts within the gpio-mlxbf2.c driver.
> >
> > Link to discussion:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210816115953.72533-7-andriy.shevchenk
> > o@...ux.intel.com/T/
> >
> > Patch 1 adds support to a GPIO IRQ handler in gpio-mlxbf2.c.
> > Patch 2 is a follow up removal of custom GPIO IRQ handling from the
> > mlxbf_gige driver and replacing it with a simple IRQ request. The ACPI
> > table for the mlxbf_gige driver is responsible for instantiating the
> > PHY GPIO interrupt via GpioInt.
> >
> > Andy Shevchenko, could you please review this patch series.
> > David Miller, could you please ack the changes in the mlxbf_gige
> > driver.
> >
> > v5 vs. v4 patch:
> > - Remove a fix which check if bgpio_init has failed.
> >   This fix should in a separate patch targeting the stable
> >   branch.
> >
>
> Hi Asmaa! Did you send this fix? I can't find it in my inbox or on patchwork.
>
> Bart

Now both applied (with David's Acks). Sorry for the delay.

Bart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ