[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9deda78a-a9a2-6b0b-634d-07c5b77282a8@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 22:46:10 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: set skb useful vars in __bpf_tx_skb
On 10/29/21 3:54 AM, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 4bace37a6a44..2dbff0944768 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -2107,9 +2107,19 @@ static inline int __bpf_tx_skb(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> return -ENETDOWN;
> }
>
> - skb->dev = dev;
> + /* The target netdevice (e.g. ifb) may use the:
> + * - skb_iif
> + * - redirected
> + * - from_ingress
> + */
> + skb->skb_iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
This doesn't look right to me to set it unconditionally in tx path, isn't ifb_ri_tasklet()
setting skb->skb_iif in this case (or __netif_receive_skb_core() in main rx path)?
Also, I would suggest to add a proper BPF selftest which outlines the issue you're solving
in here.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> + skb_set_redirected(skb, skb->tc_at_ingress);
> +#else
> skb->tstamp = 0;
> +#endif
>
> + skb->dev = dev;
> dev_xmit_recursion_inc();
> ret = dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> dev_xmit_recursion_dec();
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists