netdev - Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: Add quirk to disable deep sleep with certain hardware revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYLE/QFd+qeSlwU9@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:21:01 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwifiex: Add quirk to disable deep sleep with certain
 hardware revision

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:25:44PM +0100, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> The issue only appeared for some community members using Surface devices,
> happening on the Surface Book 2 of one person, but not on the Surface Book
> 2 of another person. When investigating we were poking around in the dark
> for a long time and almost gave up until we found that those two devices
> had different hardware revisions of the same wifi card installed (ChipRev
> 20 vs 21).
> 
> So it seems pretty clear that with revision 21 they fixed some hardware
> bug that causes those spurious wakeups.

Seems reasonable, thanks for the thorough handling!

> FWIW, obviously a proper workaround for this would have to be implemented
> in the firmware.

Yeah, but you only get those if you're a paying customer apparently :(

I wonder if the original OEM got firmware fixes, but because they don't
use Linux, nobody bothered to roll those into the linux-firmware repo.

Brian