[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYLjaYCQHzqBzN1l@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 20:30:49 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: ethernet: Add driver for Sunplus SP7021
> config NET_VENDOR_SUNPLUS
> bool "Sunplus devices"
> default y
> depends on ARCH_SUNPLUS
Does it actually depend on ARCH_SUNPLUS? What do you make use of?
Ideally, you want it to also build with COMPILE_TEST, so that the
driver gets build by 0-day and all the other build bots.
> ---help---
> If you have a network (Ethernet) card belonging to this
> class, say Y here.
>
> Note that the answer to this question doesn't directly
> affect the kernel: saying N will just cause the configurator
> to skip all the questions about Sunplus cards. If you say Y,
> you will be asked for your specific card in the following
> questions.
>
> if NET_VENDOR_SUNPLUS
>
> config SP7021_EMAC
> tristate "Sunplus Dual 10M/100M Ethernet (with L2 switch) devices"
> depends on ETHERNET && SOC_SP7021
Does it actually depend on SOC_SP7021 to build?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists