netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mwifiex: Add quirk to disable deep sleep with certain hardware revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f688d90c-f625-7b10-fde9-769bc1d49334@v0yd.nl>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 00:25:22 +0100
From:   Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
        "open list:TI WILINK WIRELES..." <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mwifiex: Add quirk to disable deep sleep with
 certain hardware revision

On 11/3/21 22:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 10:19 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@...d.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Fourth revision of this patch.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20211028073729.24408-1-verdre@v0yd.nl/T/
>> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20211103135529.8537-1-verdre@v0yd.nl/T/
>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/YYLJVoR9egoPpmLv@smile.fi.intel.com/T/
> 
> Not sure why you ignored my tag...
> As we discussed with Bjorn, it's fine to me to leave messages splitted
> to two lines.

Whoops, sorry, that wasn't on purpose. I'm still not really used to the whole
email workflow of the kernel...

> 
>> Changes between v3 and v4:
>>   - Add patch to ensure 0-termination of version string
> 
>