[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CY4PR07MB27576B46D37E39F9F1789A31C18C9@CY4PR07MB2757.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:14:33 +0000
From: Parshuram Raju Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next PATCH v5] net: macb: Fix several edge cases in validate
Hi Sean,
Thanks for this improvement.
>+ if (!macb_is_gem(bp) ||
>+ (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_GIGABIT_MODE_AVAILABLE)) {
>+ have_1g = true;
>+ if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_PCS)
>+ have_sgmii = true;
>+ if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_HIGH_SPEED)
>+ have_10g = true;
As I understand, MACB_CAPS_GIGABIT_MODE_AVAILABLE is used as a quirk in configs
to prevent giga bit operation support, Nicolas should have more information about this.
macb_is_gem() tells whether giga bit operations is supported by HW, MACB_CAPS_PCS indicate
whether PCS is included in the design (needed for SGMII and 10G operation), MACB_CAPS_HIGH_SPEED
indicate if design supports 10G operation.
I believe this should be
>+ if (macb_is_gem(bp) &&
>+ (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_GIGABIT_MODE_AVAILABLE)) {
>+ have_1g = true;
>+ if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_PCS)
>+ have_sgmii = true;
>+ if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_HIGH_SPEED)
>+ have_10g = true;
Regards,
Parshuram Thombare
Powered by blists - more mailing lists