lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211104102933.3c6f5b12@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 10:29:33 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Add PTP support for BCM53128 switch

On Thu,  4 Nov 2021 14:31:54 +0100 Martin Kaistra wrote:
> this series adds PTP support to the b53 DSA driver for the BCM53128
> switch using the BroadSync HD feature.
> 
> As there seems to be only one filter (either by Ethertype or DA) for
> timestamping incoming packets, only L2 is supported.
> 
> To be able to use the timecounter infrastructure with a counter that
> wraps around at a non-power of two point, patch 2 adds support for such
> a custom point. Alternatively I could fix up the delta every time a
> wrap-around occurs in the driver itself, but this way it can also be
> useful for other hardware.

Please make sure that the code builds as a module and that each patch
compiles cleanly with W=1 C=1 flags set - build the entire tree first
with W=1 C=1 cause there will be extra warning noise, then apply your
patches one by one and recompile, there should be no warnings since b53
itself builds cleanly.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ