netdev - Re: [PATCHv2 net 4/4] security: implement sctp_assoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 04 Nov 2021 11:02:13 +0000 (GMT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     paul@...l-moore.com
Cc:     lucien.xin@...il.com, omosnace@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        marcelo.leitner@...il.com, jmorris@...ei.org,
        richard_c_haines@...nternet.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 4/4] security: implement sctp_assoc_established
 hook in selinux

From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 23:17:00 -0400

> 
> While I understand you did not intend to mislead DaveM and the netdev
> folks with the v2 patchset, your failure to properly manage the
> patchset's metadata *did* mislead them and as a result a patchset with
> serious concerns from the SELinux side was merged.  You need to revert
> this patchset while we continue to discuss, develop, and verify a
> proper fix that we can all agree on.  If you decide not to revert this
> patchset I will work with DaveM to do it for you, and that is not
> something any of us wants.

I would prefer a follow-up rathewr than a revert at this point.

Please work with Xin to come up with a fix that works for both of you.

Thanks.