[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211107.190959.1432110661171124830.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 19:09:59 +0000 (GMT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: paul@...l-moore.com
Cc: omosnace@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
lucien.xin@...il.com, richard_c_haines@...nternet.com,
vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selinux: fix SCTP client peeloff socket labeling
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 09:12:57 -0500
>
> When we change things as significantly as we are doing here, i.e.
> shifting some of the labeling away from the endpoint to the
> association, I much rather we do it as a chunk/patchset so that we can
> review it in a consistent manner. Some of that has gone out the door
> here because of what I view as recklessness on the part of the netdev
> folks, but that doesn't mean we need to abandon all order. Let's get
> all the fixes and repairs queued up in a single patchset so that we
> can fully see what the end result of these changes are going to look
> like. Further, I think it would be good if at least one of the
> patches has a very clear explanation in the commit description (not
> the cover letter, I want to see this in the git log) of what happens
Cover letters show up in the merge commit log message for the patch
series so they show up in the git commit log.
Paul, please stop being so difficult and let's fix this.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists