netdev - [RFC PATCH 02/16] devlink: Delete useless checks of holding devlink lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <942459fbd6968a8efc712e64e9261727ac7ea236.1636390483.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon,  8 Nov 2021 19:05:24 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 02/16] devlink: Delete useless checks of holding devlink lock

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>

The snapshot API is fully protected by devlink->lock and these internal
functions are not exported directly to the code outside of the devlink.c.
This makes the checks of holding devlink lock as completely redundant.

Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
 net/core/devlink.c | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index fb9e60da9a77..4df241a62a44 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -5221,8 +5221,6 @@ static int __devlink_snapshot_id_increment(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id)
 	unsigned long count;
 	void *p;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	p = xa_load(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id);
 	if (WARN_ON(!p))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -5257,8 +5255,6 @@ static void __devlink_snapshot_id_decrement(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id)
 	unsigned long count;
 	void *p;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	p = xa_load(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id);
 	if (WARN_ON(!p))
 		return;
@@ -5296,8 +5292,6 @@ static void __devlink_snapshot_id_decrement(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id)
  */
 static int __devlink_snapshot_id_insert(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	if (xa_load(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id))
 		return -EEXIST;
 
@@ -5323,8 +5317,6 @@ static int __devlink_snapshot_id_insert(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id)
  */
 static int __devlink_region_snapshot_id_get(struct devlink *devlink, u32 *id)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	return xa_alloc(&devlink->snapshot_ids, id, xa_mk_value(1),
 			xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
@@ -5351,8 +5343,6 @@ __devlink_region_snapshot_create(struct devlink_region *region,
 	struct devlink_snapshot *snapshot;
 	int err;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	/* check if region can hold one more snapshot */
 	if (region->cur_snapshots == region->max_snapshots)
 		return -ENOSPC;
@@ -5389,8 +5379,6 @@ static void devlink_region_snapshot_del(struct devlink_region *region,
 {
 	struct devlink *devlink = region->devlink;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&devlink->lock);
-
 	devlink_nl_region_notify(region, snapshot, DEVLINK_CMD_REGION_DEL);
 	region->cur_snapshots--;
 	list_del(&snapshot->list);
-- 
2.33.1