[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211109111213.6vo5swdhxjvgmyjt@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 13:12:13 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@...utronix.de>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] net: dsa: b53: Add logic for TX timestamping
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:50:08AM +0100, Martin Kaistra wrote:
> In order to get the switch to generate a timestamp for a transmitted
> packet, we need to set the TS bit in the BRCM tag. The switch will then
> create a status frame, which gets send back to the cpu.
> In b53_port_txtstamp() we put the skb into a waiting position.
>
> When a status frame is received, we extract the timestamp and put the time
> according to our timecounter into the waiting skb. When
> TX_TSTAMP_TIMEOUT is reached and we have no means to correctly get back
> a full timestamp, we cancel the process.
>
> As the status frame doesn't contain a reference to the original packet,
> only one packet with timestamp request can be sent at a time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kaistra <martin.kaistra@...utronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.h | 8 +++++
> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> index a9408f9cd414..56a9de89b38b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> @@ -2301,6 +2301,7 @@ static const struct dsa_switch_ops b53_switch_ops = {
> .port_change_mtu = b53_change_mtu,
> .get_ts_info = b53_get_ts_info,
> .port_rxtstamp = b53_port_rxtstamp,
> + .port_txtstamp = b53_port_txtstamp,
> };
>
> struct b53_chip_data {
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.c
> index f8dd8d484d93..5567135ba8b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.c
> @@ -100,14 +100,65 @@ static long b53_hwtstamp_work(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
> {
> struct b53_device *dev =
> container_of(ptp, struct b53_device, ptp_clock_info);
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
> + int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
> timecounter_read(&dev->tc);
> mutex_unlock(&dev->ptp_mutex);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) {
> + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps;
> +
> + if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, i))
> + continue;
dsa_switch_for_each_user_port and replace i with dp->index.
This makes for a more efficient iteration through the port list.
> +
> + ps = &dev->ports[i].port_hwtstamp;
> +
> + if (test_bit(B53_HWTSTAMP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ps->state) &&
> + time_is_before_jiffies(ps->tx_tstamp_start +
> + TX_TSTAMP_TIMEOUT)) {
> + dev_err(dev->dev,
> + "Timeout while waiting for Tx timestamp!\n");
> + dev_kfree_skb_any(ps->tx_skb);
> + ps->tx_skb = NULL;
> + clear_bit_unlock(B53_HWTSTAMP_TX_IN_PROGRESS,
> + &ps->state);
> + }
> + }
> +
> return B53_PTP_OVERFLOW_PERIOD;
> }
>
> +void b53_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct b53_device *dev = ds->priv;
> + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps = &dev->ports[port].port_hwtstamp;
> + struct sk_buff *clone;
> + unsigned int type;
> +
> + type = ptp_classify_raw(skb);
> +
> + if (type != PTP_CLASS_V2_L2)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!test_bit(B53_HWTSTAMP_ENABLED, &ps->state))
> + return;
> +
> + clone = skb_clone_sk(skb);
> + if (!clone)
> + return;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit_lock(B53_HWTSTAMP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ps->state)) {
Is it ok if you simply don't timestamp a second skb which may be sent
while the first one is in flight, I wonder? What PTP profiles have you
tested with? At just one PTP packet at a time, the switch isn't giving
you a lot. Is it a hardware limitation?
> + kfree_skb(clone);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ps->tx_skb = clone;
> + ps->tx_tstamp_start = jiffies;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(b53_port_txtstamp);
> +
> bool b53_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int type)
> {
> @@ -136,6 +187,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(b53_port_rxtstamp);
>
> int b53_ptp_init(struct b53_device *dev)
> {
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> +
> mutex_init(&dev->ptp_mutex);
>
> /* Enable BroadSync HD for all ports */
> @@ -191,6 +244,9 @@ int b53_ptp_init(struct b53_device *dev)
>
> ptp_schedule_worker(dev->ptp_clock, 0);
>
> + dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, dev->ds)
> + dp->priv = &dev->ports[dp->index].port_hwtstamp;
> +
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(b53_ptp_init);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.h b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.h
> index 3b3437870c55..f888f0a2022a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_ptp.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "b53_priv.h"
>
> #define SKB_PTP_TYPE(__skb) (*(unsigned int *)((__skb)->cb))
> +#define TX_TSTAMP_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(40)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_B53_PTP
> int b53_ptp_init(struct b53_device *dev);
> @@ -18,6 +19,8 @@ int b53_get_ts_info(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> struct ethtool_ts_info *info);
> bool b53_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int type);
> +void b53_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_B53_PTP */
>
> static inline int b53_ptp_init(struct b53_device *dev)
> @@ -41,5 +44,10 @@ static inline bool b53_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline void b53_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c
> index d611c1073deb..a44ac81fa097 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include <linux/dsa/brcm.h>
> #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/ptp_classify.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/dsa/b53.h>
>
> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@
> #define BRCM_EG_TC_SHIFT 5
> #define BRCM_EG_TC_MASK 0x7
> #define BRCM_EG_PID_MASK 0x1f
> +#define BRCM_EG_T_R 0x20
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_BRCM) || \
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_BRCM_PREPEND)
> @@ -85,6 +87,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> + unsigned int type = ptp_classify_raw(skb);
> + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps = dp->priv;
> u16 queue = skb_get_queue_mapping(skb);
> u8 *brcm_tag;
>
> @@ -112,7 +116,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb,
> */
> brcm_tag[0] = (1 << BRCM_OPCODE_SHIFT) |
> ((queue & BRCM_IG_TC_MASK) << BRCM_IG_TC_SHIFT);
> +
> brcm_tag[1] = 0;
> +
> + if (type == PTP_CLASS_V2_L2 &&
> + test_bit(B53_HWTSTAMP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ps->state))
> + brcm_tag[1] = 1 << BRCM_IG_TS_SHIFT;
> +
> brcm_tag[2] = 0;
> if (dp->index == 8)
> brcm_tag[2] = BRCM_IG_DSTMAP2_MASK;
> @@ -126,6 +136,33 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_xmit_ll(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return skb;
> }
>
> +static int set_txtstamp(struct dsa_port *dp,
> + int port,
> + u64 ns)
> +{
> + struct b53_device *b53_dev = dp->ds->priv;
> + struct b53_port_hwtstamp *ps = dp->priv;
> + struct skb_shared_hwtstamps shhwtstamps;
> + struct sk_buff *tmp_skb;
> +
> + if (!ps->tx_skb)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&b53_dev->ptp_mutex);
> + ns = timecounter_cyc2time(&b53_dev->tc, ns);
> + mutex_unlock(&b53_dev->ptp_mutex);
This is called from brcm_tag_rcv_ll which runs in softirq context.
You can't take a sleeping mutex, sorry.
Please test your patches with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and friends
(lockdep etc).
> +
> + memset(&shhwtstamps, 0, sizeof(shhwtstamps));
> + shhwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(ns);
> + tmp_skb = ps->tx_skb;
> + ps->tx_skb = NULL;
> +
> + clear_bit_unlock(B53_HWTSTAMP_TX_IN_PROGRESS, &ps->state);
> + skb_complete_tx_timestamp(tmp_skb, &shhwtstamps);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Frames with this tag have one of these two layouts:
> * -----------------------------------
> * | MAC DA | MAC SA | 4b tag | Type | DSA_TAG_PROTO_BRCM
> @@ -143,6 +180,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_rcv_ll(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int offset,
> int *tag_len)
> {
> + struct dsa_port *dp;
> int source_port;
> u8 *brcm_tag;
> u32 tstamp;
> @@ -177,6 +215,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *brcm_tag_rcv_ll(struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (!skb->dev)
> return NULL;
>
> + /* Check whether this is a status frame */
> + if (unlikely(*tag_len == 8 && brcm_tag[3] & BRCM_EG_T_R)) {
> + dp = dsa_slave_to_port(skb->dev);
> +
> + set_txtstamp(dp, source_port, tstamp);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> /* Remove Broadcom tag and update checksum */
> skb_pull_rcsum(skb, *tag_len);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists