[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhTVNOUHJp+NbqV5AgtwR6+3V6am0SKGKF0CegsPqjQ8pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:00:08 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net,
Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selinux: fix SCTP client peeloff socket labeling
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:21 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:59:49 +0100 Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > As agreed with Xin Long, I'm posting this fix up instead of him. I am
> > now fairly convinced that this is the right way to deal with the
> > immediate problem of client peeloff socket labeling. I'll work on
> > addressing the side problem regarding selinux_socket_post_create()
> > being called on the peeloff sockets separately.
>
> IIUC Paul would like to see this part to come up in the same series.
Just to reaffirm the IIUC part - yes, your understanding is correct.
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists