netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Add selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Nov 2021 18:17:08 +0000
From:   Joe Burton <jevburton@...gle.com>
To:     Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Joe Burton <jevburton.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@...gle.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] bpf: Add selftests

Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 02:32:37PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:

> In fentry__x64_sys_write(), you just do trigger updates to maps, so for the
> portability of the test
> (e.g. run-able for arm64)

Agreed that the test should be runnable on arm64. I haven't tested there
yet but I'll do that before sending out v4.

> and minimal dependency (e.g. don't depends on /tmp),
> why do you
> using nanosleep() and replacing fentry_x64_sys_write by
> tp/syscalls/sys_enter_nanosleep instead.

As written, the example actually modifies the return of write(), so I
don't think I can switch to tp/syscalls/* without significantly
reworking the example. To minimize the amount of reworking while
improving compatibility, how does this sound:

1. Add #ifdefs to support arm64
2. Instead of opening /tmp/map_trace_test_file, open /dev/null

Of course this isn't as portable as your proposal but I think it might
be an acceptable compromise.

Best,
Joe