[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYrmselghIy+qtn8@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 9 Nov 2021 22:22:57 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 7/8] net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs support
> +static int
> +qca8k_parse_netdev(unsigned long rules, u32 *offload_trigger, u32 *mask)
This is a rather oddly named function, given that it is not actually
passed a netdev. netdev has a very well defined meaning in the network
stack, struct net_device.
       Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
