[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f193b68b8eb7ee69e6beb5b93c6dba7475359d3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:22:57 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>, jgross@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Vivek Thampi <vithampi@...are.com>,
Vishal Bhakta <vbhakta@...are.com>,
Ronak Doshi <doshir@...are.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>,
sdeep@...are.com, amakhalov@...are.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, keerthanak@...are.com,
srivatsab@...are.com, anishs@...are.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Mark VMware mailing list entries as
private
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:16 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:37:53 -0800 Joe Perches wrote:
> > > @@ -6134,8 +6134,8 @@ T: git git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc
> > > F: drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/
> > >
> > > DRM DRIVER FOR VMWARE VIRTUAL GPU
> > > -M: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>
> > > M: Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>
> > > +L: linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com (private)
> >
> > This MAINTAINERS file is for _public_ use, marking something
> > non-public isn't useful.
>
> But Greg has a point. Corporations like to send us code with a list
> as the maintainer and MODULE_AUTHOR set to corp's name. We deal with
> humans, not legal entities.
MAINTAINERS is used not for corporations private use but
to find out _who_ to send and cc patches and defect reports.
A "private" email address used only for corporate internal review
cannot receive patches.
> I've been trying to get them to use "M: email" without the name,
> but "L: list (private)" also works.
>
> Either way I feel like we need _some_ way to tell humans from corporate
> "please CC this address" entries.
This is not the way AFAIKT.
> > private makes no sense and likely these L: entries shouldn't exist.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists