| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:24:46 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
To: <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: <benh@...zon.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/13] af_unix: Relax race in unix_autobind().
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:10:24 -0800
> On 11/6/21 2:17 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > When we bind an AF_UNIX socket without a name specified, the kernel selects
> > an available one from 0x00000 to 0xFFFFF. unix_autobind() starts searching
> > from a number in the 'static' variable and increments it after acquiring
> > two locks.
> >
> > If multiple processes try autobind, they obtain the same lock and check if
> > a socket in the hash list has the same name. If not, one process uses it,
> > and all except one end up retrying the _next_ number (actually not, it may
> > be incremented by the other processes). The more we autobind sockets in
> > parallel, the longer the latency gets. We can avoid such a race by
> > searching for a name from a random number.
> >
> > These show latency in unix_autobind() while 64 CPUs are simultaneously
> > autobind-ing 1024 sockets for each.
> >
> > Without this patch:
> >
> > usec : count distribution
> > 0 : 1176 |*** |
> > 2 : 3655 |*********** |
> > 4 : 4094 |************* |
> > 6 : 3831 |************ |
> > 8 : 3829 |************ |
> > 10 : 3844 |************ |
> > 12 : 3638 |*********** |
> > 14 : 2992 |********* |
> > 16 : 2485 |******* |
> > 18 : 2230 |******* |
> > 20 : 2095 |****** |
> > 22 : 1853 |***** |
> > 24 : 1827 |***** |
> > 26 : 1677 |***** |
> > 28 : 1473 |**** |
> > 30 : 1573 |***** |
> > 32 : 1417 |**** |
> > 34 : 1385 |**** |
> > 36 : 1345 |**** |
> > 38 : 1344 |**** |
> > 40 : 1200 |*** |
> >
> > With this patch:
> >
> > usec : count distribution
> > 0 : 1855 |****** |
> > 2 : 6464 |********************* |
> > 4 : 9936 |******************************** |
> > 6 : 12107 |****************************************|
> > 8 : 10441 |********************************** |
> > 10 : 7264 |*********************** |
> > 12 : 4254 |************** |
> > 14 : 2538 |******** |
> > 16 : 1596 |***** |
> > 18 : 1088 |*** |
> > 20 : 800 |** |
> > 22 : 670 |** |
> > 24 : 601 |* |
> > 26 : 562 |* |
> > 28 : 525 |* |
> > 30 : 446 |* |
> > 32 : 378 |* |
> > 34 : 337 |* |
> > 36 : 317 |* |
> > 38 : 314 |* |
> > 40 : 298 | |
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>
> > ---
> > net/unix/af_unix.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > index 643f0358bf7a..55d570b23475 100644
> > --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > @@ -1075,8 +1075,7 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct sock *sk)
> > unsigned int new_hash, old_hash = sk->sk_hash;
> > struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
> > struct unix_address *addr;
> > - unsigned int retries = 0;
> > - static u32 ordernum = 1;
> > + u32 initnum, ordernum;
> > int err;
> >
> > err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->bindlock);
> > @@ -1091,31 +1090,33 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct sock *sk)
> > if (!addr)
> > goto out;
> >
> > + addr->len = offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + 6;
> > addr->name->sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> > refcount_set(&addr->refcnt, 1);
> >
> > + initnum = ordernum = prandom_u32();
> > retry:
> > - addr->len = sprintf(addr->name->sun_path + 1, "%05x", ordernum) +
> > - offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + 1;
> > + ordernum = (ordernum + 1) & 0xFFFFF;
> > + sprintf(addr->name->sun_path + 1, "%05x", ordernum);
> >
> > new_hash = unix_abstract_hash(addr->name, addr->len, sk->sk_type);
> > unix_table_double_lock(old_hash, new_hash);
> > - ordernum = (ordernum+1)&0xFFFFF;
> >
> > if (__unix_find_socket_byname(sock_net(sk), addr->name, addr->len, new_hash)) {
> > unix_table_double_unlock(old_hash, new_hash);
> >
> > - /*
> > - * __unix_find_socket_byname() may take long time if many names
> > + /* __unix_find_socket_byname() may take long time if many names
> > * are already in use.
> > */
> > cond_resched();
> > - /* Give up if all names seems to be in use. */
> > - if (retries++ == 0xFFFFF) {
> > +
> > + if (ordernum == initnum) {
>
> Infinite loop alert, in the likely case initnum >= 2^16
Good catch!
Thank you for reviewing.
And I'm sorry for distraction in the merge window.
I'll post v2 after that.
>
> > + /* Give up if all names seems to be in use. */
> > err = -ENOSPC;
> > - kfree(addr);
> > + unix_release_addr(addr);
> > goto out;
> > }
> > +
> > goto retry;
> > }
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists