netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] iavf: missing unlocks in iavf_watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Nov 2021 10:27:16 +0100
From:   Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Jakub Pawlak <jakub.pawlak@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Mateusz Palczewski <mateusz.palczewski@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net] iavf: missing unlocks in
 iavf_watchdog_task()

Dear Dan,


Am 10.11.21 um 10:05 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:53:50AM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:

>> Thank you for your patch.
>>
>> For the future, just a nit for the commit message summary. Could you make it
>> a statement by adding a verb (in imperative mood) [1].
>>
>>> iavf: Add missing unlocks in iavf_watchdog_task()
> 
> Imperative shmeritave.
> 
> When subsystems get taken over by fussy bureaucrats then I only send
> them bug reports instead of patches.

It was just a wish as the standard commit messages follow that format, 
and any verb could be added. It’s not a requirement to my knowledge, and 
I do not have any authority anyway. Sorry about that, and thank you for 
your patches.


Kind regards,

Paul