lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+Pa9iD80=rQd5nwCSr1eN9j5q9GqC2QtEPCXPQazZh9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Nov 2021 09:36:20 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/csum: rewrite csum_partial()

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:23 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 8:45 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Looks nice, happen to have shiny perf numbers to show how awesome it it?
> > :-)
>
> On a networking load on cascadlake, line rate received on a single thread, I see
> perf -e cycles:pp -C <cpu>
>
> Before:
>        4.16%  [kernel]       [k] csum_partial
> After:
>         0.83%  [kernel]       [k] csum_partial
>
> If run in a loop 1,000,000 times,
>

However, there must be an error in my patch, return values are not the
same on unaligned buffers.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ