[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211115150620.057674ae@fixe.home>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:06:20 +0100
From: Clément Léger <clement.leger@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] net: ocelot: pre-compute injection frame header
content
Le Mon, 15 Nov 2021 06:08:00 -0800,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> a écrit :
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 11:13:44 +0100 Clément Léger wrote:
> > Test on standard packets with UDP (iperf3 -t 100 -l 1460 -u -b 0 -c *)
> > - With pre-computed header: UDP TX: 33Mbit/s
> > - Without UDP TX: 31Mbit/s
> > -> 6.5% improvement
> >
> > Test on small packets with UDP (iperf3 -t 100 -l 700 -u -b 0 -c *)
> > - With pre-computed header: UDP TX: 15.8Mbit/s
> > - Without UDP TX: 16.4Mbit/s
> > -> 4.3% improvement
>
> Something's wrong with these numbers or I'm missing context.
> You say improvement in both cases yet in the latter case the
> new number is lower?
You are right Jakub, I swapped the last two results,
Test on small packets with UDP (iperf3 -t 100 -l 700 -u -b 0 -c *)
- With pre-computed header: UDP TX: 16.4Mbit/s
- Without UDP TX: 15.8Mbit/s
-> 4.3% improvement
--
Clément Léger,
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineer at Bootlin
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists