netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bnxt_en: extend RTNL to VF check in devlink driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Nov 2021 08:20:27 -0800
From:   Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edwin.peer@...adcom.com,
        gospo@...adcom.com, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] bnxt_en: extend RTNL to VF check in devlink driver_reinit

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 6:39 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 00:30:34 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> > >> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c:445:48: error: no member named 'sriov_cfg' in 'struct bnxt'
> >                    if (BNXT_PF(bp) && (bp->pf.active_vfs || bp->sriov_cfg)) {
> >                                                             ~~  ^
>
> Hi Michael, is this a false positive? Is the fix coming?

It's a real error when CONFIG_BNXT_SRIOV is not enabled.  I'll send
the fix later today.  Thanks.