lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:48:47 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Arjun Roy <arjunroy@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/20] tcp: remove dead code in
 __tcp_v6_send_check()

On 11/15/21 12:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> For some reason, I forgot to change __tcp_v6_send_check() at
> the same time I removed (ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) check
> in __tcp_v4_send_check()
> 
> Fixes: 98be9b12096f ("tcp: remove dead code after CHECKSUM_PARTIAL adoption")

Given the Fixes, should this go one through -net?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ