| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:24:35 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 09/29] bpf: Add support to load multi func tracing program
Adding support to load tracing program with new BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC flag,
that allows the program to be loaded without specific function to be
attached to.
Such program will be allowed to be attached to multiple functions
in following patches.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 +++++++
5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index c93c629b5725..35f484f323f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -881,6 +881,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
bool func_proto_unreliable;
bool sleepable;
bool tail_call_reachable;
+ bool multi_func;
struct hlist_node tramp_hlist;
/* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index fc8b344eecba..ca05e35e0478 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1111,6 +1111,13 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
*/
#define BPF_F_SLEEPABLE (1U << 4)
+/* If BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the verifier does
+ * not expect BTF ID for the program, instead it assumes it's function
+ * with 6 u64 arguments. No trampoline is created for the program. Such
+ * program can be attached to multiple functions.
+ */
+#define BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC (1U << 5)
+
/* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have
* the following extensions:
*
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 0df8b2f3d982..648155f0a4b1 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <linux/bpf-netns.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
+#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
#define IS_FD_ARRAY(map) ((map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY || \
(map)->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_ARRAY || \
@@ -2040,7 +2041,8 @@ static int
bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
enum bpf_attach_type expected_attach_type,
struct btf *attach_btf, u32 btf_id,
- struct bpf_prog *dst_prog)
+ struct bpf_prog *dst_prog,
+ bool multi_func)
{
if (btf_id) {
if (btf_id > BTF_MAX_TYPE)
@@ -2060,6 +2062,14 @@ bpf_prog_load_check_attach(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
}
}
+ if (multi_func) {
+ if (prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!attach_btf || btf_id)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (attach_btf && (!btf_id || dst_prog))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2183,6 +2193,16 @@ static bool is_perfmon_prog_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
}
}
+#define DEFINE_BPF_MULTI_FUNC(args...) \
+ extern int bpf_multi_func(args); \
+ int __init bpf_multi_func(args) { return 0; }
+
+DEFINE_BPF_MULTI_FUNC(unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
+ unsigned long a3, unsigned long a4,
+ unsigned long a5, unsigned long a6)
+
+BTF_ID_LIST_SINGLE(bpf_multi_func_btf_id, func, bpf_multi_func)
+
/* last field in 'union bpf_attr' used by this command */
#define BPF_PROG_LOAD_LAST_FIELD fd_array
@@ -2193,6 +2213,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
struct btf *attach_btf = NULL;
int err;
char license[128];
+ bool multi_func;
bool is_gpl;
if (CHECK_ATTR(BPF_PROG_LOAD))
@@ -2202,7 +2223,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT |
BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ |
BPF_F_SLEEPABLE |
- BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32))
+ BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 |
+ BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC))
return -EINVAL;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
@@ -2233,6 +2255,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
if (is_perfmon_prog_type(type) && !perfmon_capable())
return -EPERM;
+ multi_func = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC;
+
/* attach_prog_fd/attach_btf_obj_fd can specify fd of either bpf_prog
* or btf, we need to check which one it is
*/
@@ -2251,7 +2275,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
return -ENOTSUPP;
}
}
- } else if (attr->attach_btf_id) {
+ } else if (attr->attach_btf_id || multi_func) {
/* fall back to vmlinux BTF, if BTF type ID is specified */
attach_btf = bpf_get_btf_vmlinux();
if (IS_ERR(attach_btf))
@@ -2264,7 +2288,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
bpf_prog_load_fixup_attach_type(attr);
if (bpf_prog_load_check_attach(type, attr->expected_attach_type,
attach_btf, attr->attach_btf_id,
- dst_prog)) {
+ dst_prog, multi_func)) {
if (dst_prog)
bpf_prog_put(dst_prog);
if (attach_btf)
@@ -2284,10 +2308,11 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
prog->expected_attach_type = attr->expected_attach_type;
prog->aux->attach_btf = attach_btf;
- prog->aux->attach_btf_id = attr->attach_btf_id;
+ prog->aux->attach_btf_id = multi_func ? bpf_multi_func_btf_id[0] : attr->attach_btf_id;
prog->aux->dst_prog = dst_prog;
prog->aux->offload_requested = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
prog->aux->sleepable = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
+ prog->aux->multi_func = multi_func;
err = security_bpf_prog_alloc(prog->aux);
if (err)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d4249ef6ca7e..af6a39bbb0dc 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -13983,7 +13983,8 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
if (!bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog))
return -EINVAL;
return 0;
- }
+ } else if (prog->aux->multi_func)
+ return prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ? 0 : -EINVAL;
if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
ret = bpf_lsm_verify_prog(&env->log, prog);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index fc8b344eecba..ca05e35e0478 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1111,6 +1111,13 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
*/
#define BPF_F_SLEEPABLE (1U << 4)
+/* If BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the verifier does
+ * not expect BTF ID for the program, instead it assumes it's function
+ * with 6 u64 arguments. No trampoline is created for the program. Such
+ * program can be attached to multiple functions.
+ */
+#define BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC (1U << 5)
+
/* When BPF ldimm64's insn[0].src_reg != 0 then this can have
* the following extensions:
*
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists