netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: phy: marvell10g: select host interface configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211118144628.1925ae03@thinkpad>
Date:   Thu, 18 Nov 2021 14:46:28 +0100
From:   Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: phy: marvell10g: select host
 interface configuration

On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:41:27 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 11:50:50PM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> > +static int mv3310_select_mactype(unsigned long *interfaces)
> > +{
> > +	if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_USXGMII, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_USXGMII;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII, interfaces) &&
> > +		 test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_10GBASER;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII, interfaces) &&
> > +		 test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RXAUI, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_RXAUI;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII, interfaces) &&
> > +		 test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XAUI, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_3310_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_XAUI;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GBASER, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_10GBASER_RATE_MATCH;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RXAUI, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_RXAUI_RATE_MATCH;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XAUI, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_3310_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_XAUI_RATE_MATCH;
> > +	else if (test_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII, interfaces))
> > +		return MV_V2_33X0_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_10GBASER;  
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There are differences in the MACTYPE register between the 88X3310
> and 88X3340. For example, the 88X3340 has no support for XAUI.
> This is documented in the data sheet, and in the definitions of
> these values - note that MV_V2_3310_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_XAUI and
> MV_V2_3310_PORT_CTRL_MACTYPE_XAUI_RATE_MATCH are only applicable
> to the 88X3310 (they don't use MV_V2_33X0_*).

Yes, but 88X3340 does not support XAUI, only RXAUI, it is defined in
supported_interfaces. So PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XAUI will never be set in
interfaces, and thus this function can be used for both 88X3310 and
88X3340.

Marek