| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:15:01 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: kunit: add a test for dev_addr_lists
Add a KUnit test for the dev_addr API.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
net/Kconfig | 5 +
net/core/Makefile | 2 +
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig
index 074472dfa94a..8a1f9d0287de 100644
--- a/net/Kconfig
+++ b/net/Kconfig
@@ -455,4 +455,9 @@ config ETHTOOL_NETLINK
netlink. It provides better extensibility and some new features,
e.g. notification messages.
+config NETDEV_ADDR_LIST_TEST
+ tristate "Unit tests for device address list"
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+
endif # if NET
diff --git a/net/core/Makefile b/net/core/Makefile
index 6bdcb2cafed8..a8e4f737692b 100644
--- a/net/core/Makefile
+++ b/net/core/Makefile
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ obj-y += dev.o dev_addr_lists.o dst.o netevent.o \
sock_diag.o dev_ioctl.o tso.o sock_reuseport.o \
fib_notifier.o xdp.o flow_offload.o gro.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_NETDEV_ADDR_LIST_TEST) += dev_addr_lists_test.o
+
obj-y += net-sysfs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PAGE_POOL) += page_pool.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += net-procfs.o
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b4faad5c98b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+
+static const struct net_device_ops dummy_netdev_ops = {
+};
+
+struct dev_addr_test_priv {
+ u32 addr_seen;
+};
+
+static int dev_addr_test_sync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned char *a)
+{
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ if (a[0] < 31 && !memchr_inv(a, a[0], ETH_ALEN))
+ datp->addr_seen |= 1 << a[0];
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dev_addr_test_unsync(struct net_device *netdev,
+ const unsigned char *a)
+{
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ if (a[0] < 31 && !memchr_inv(a, a[0], ETH_ALEN))
+ datp->addr_seen &= ~(1 << a[0]);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp;
+ struct net_device *netdev;
+ int err;
+
+ netdev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(*datp));
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, netdev != NULL);
+
+ test->priv = netdev;
+ netdev->netdev_ops = &dummy_netdev_ops;
+
+ err = register_netdev(netdev);
+ if (err) {
+ free_netdev(netdev);
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
+ }
+
+ rtnl_lock();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+
+ rtnl_unlock();
+ unregister_netdev(netdev);
+ free_netdev(netdev);
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, netdev->dev_addr != NULL);
+
+ memset(addr, 2, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, memcmp(netdev->dev_addr, addr, sizeof(addr)));
+
+ memset(addr, 3, sizeof(addr));
+ dev_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, memcmp(netdev->dev_addr, addr, sizeof(addr)));
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_sync_one(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+
+ datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ memset(addr, 1, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 2, datp->addr_seen);
+
+ memset(addr, 2, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+
+ datp->addr_seen = 0;
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ /* It's not going to sync anything because the main address is
+ * considered synced and we overwrite in place.
+ */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, datp->addr_seen);
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_add_del(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+ int i;
+
+ datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ }
+ /* Add 3 again */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xf, datp->addr_seen);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xf, datp->addr_seen);
+
+ for (i = 1; i < 4; i++) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ }
+
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1, datp->addr_seen);
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_del_main(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+
+ memset(addr, 1, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOENT, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOENT, dev_addr_del(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_add_set(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ struct dev_addr_test_priv *datp;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+ int i;
+
+ datp = netdev_priv(netdev);
+
+ /* There is no external API like dev_addr_add_excl(),
+ * so shuffle the tree a little bit and exploit aliasing.
+ */
+ for (i = 1; i < 16; i++) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ }
+
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_addr_add(netdev, addr,
+ NETDEV_HW_ADDR_T_LAN));
+ memset(addr, 0, sizeof(addr));
+ eth_hw_addr_set(netdev, addr);
+
+ __hw_addr_sync_dev(&netdev->dev_addrs, netdev, dev_addr_test_sync,
+ dev_addr_test_unsync);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xffff, datp->addr_seen);
+}
+
+static void dev_addr_test_add_excl(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ u8 addr[ETH_ALEN];
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_uc_add_excl(netdev, addr));
+ }
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EEXIST, dev_uc_add_excl(netdev, addr));
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 10; i += 2) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, dev_uc_del(netdev, addr));
+ }
+ for (i = 1; i < 10; i += 2) {
+ memset(addr, i, sizeof(addr));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -EEXIST, dev_uc_add_excl(netdev, addr));
+ }
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case dev_addr_test_cases[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_basic),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_sync_one),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_add_del),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_del_main),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_add_set),
+ KUNIT_CASE(dev_addr_test_add_excl),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite dev_addr_test_suite = {
+ .name = "dev-addr-list-test",
+ .test_cases = dev_addr_test_cases,
+ .init = dev_addr_test_init,
+ .exit = dev_addr_test_exit,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(dev_addr_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists