[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211119142155.3779933-5-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 06:21:52 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] net: unexport dev_addr_init() & dev_addr_flush()
There are no module callers in-tree and it's hard to justify
why anyone would init or flush addresses of a netdev (note
the flush is more of a destructor, it frees netdev->dev_addr).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
index ae8b1ef00fec..a23a83ac18e5 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
@@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ void dev_addr_flush(struct net_device *dev)
__hw_addr_flush(&dev->dev_addrs);
dev->dev_addr = NULL;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_addr_flush);
/**
* dev_addr_init - Init device address list
@@ -547,7 +546,6 @@ int dev_addr_init(struct net_device *dev)
}
return err;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_addr_init);
void dev_addr_mod(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int offset,
const void *addr, size_t len)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists