netdev - [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 21 Nov 2021 23:05:30 -0800
From:   Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
        Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
        Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo

Fix trivial typo in comment from 'oveflow' to 'overflow'.

Reported-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
index aa76360d8f49..87e907add701 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
 	/* overflow bpf_sock_ops struct with final element nonzero/zero.
 	 * Regardless of the value of the final field, we don't have all the
 	 * data we need to display it, so we should trigger an overflow.
-	 * In other words oveflow checking should trump "is field zero?"
+	 * In other words overflow checking should trump "is field zero?"
 	 * checks because if we've overflowed, it shouldn't matter what the
 	 * field is - we can't trust its value so shouldn't display it.
 	 */
-- 
2.27.0