netdev - Re: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: suppress used length validation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211122105822.onarsa4sydzxqynu@steredhat>
Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 11:58:22 +0100
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        f.hetzelt@...berlin.de, david.kaplan@....com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vsock/virtio: suppress used length validation

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 04:32:01AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>It turns out that vhost vsock violates the virtio spec
>by supplying the out buffer length in the used length
>(should just be the in length).
>As a result, attempts to validate the used length fail with:
>vmw_vsock_virtio_transport virtio1: tx: used len 44 is larger than in buflen 0
>
>Since vsock driver does not use the length fox tx and
>validates the length before use for rx, it is safe to
>suppress the validation in virtio core for this driver.
>
>Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
>Fixes: 939779f5152d ("virtio_ring: validate used buffer length")
>Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowang@...hat.com>
>Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Thanks for this fix

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>


I think we should also fix vhost-vsock violation (in stable branches 
too).
@Halil do you plan to send a fix? Otherwise I can do it ;-)

Thanks,
Stefano