netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] mctp: Add MCTP-over-serial transport binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YZuiKw0Q7TU/+lGE@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:59:07 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mctp: Add MCTP-over-serial transport binding

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 01:11:52PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 04:23:10PM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > > ida_destroy() will not be a no-op if you have allocated some things
> > > in the past.  It should always be called when your module is removed.
> > > 
> > > Or at least that is how it used to be, if this has changed in the
> > > past year, then I am mistaken here.
> 
> I think Greg is remembering how the IDA behaved before it was converted
> to use the radix tree back in 2016 (0a835c4f090a).  About two-thirds
> of the users of the IDA and IDR forgot to call ida_destroy/idr_destroy,
> so rather than fix those places, I decided to make those data structures
> no longer require a destructor.

Ah, yes.  Glad to see that's no longer needed, sorry for the noise and
thanks for correcting me.

greg k-h