[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211123130634.14fa4972@work>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:06:34 -0300
From: Alessandro B Maurici <abmaurici@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed
handler
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:11:22 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> Yes, that is the change i would make. When adding the extra locks i
> missed that a driver was doing something like this. I will check all
> other callers to see if they are using it in odd contexts.
>
> Andrew
Andrew, this kinda of implementation is really hard to get in a fast review,
fortunately I happen to be testing one lan743x board with a 5.10.79 kernel
that had the new locks in place, and noticed that really fast, but I wrongly
assumed that call was okayish since the driver was on stable.
If you need to do some testing I will still have the hardware with me for
some time.
Alessandro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists