[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211123082515.65956-2-tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:25:16 +0800
From: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net/smc: Clean up local struct sock variables
There remains some variables to replace with local struct sock. So clean
them up all.
Fixes: 3163c5071f25 ("net/smc: use local struct sock variables consistently")
Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/smc_close.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index 0f9ffba07d26..9b235fbb089a 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -354,9 +354,9 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (rxflags->peer_conn_abort) {
/* peer has not received all data */
smc_close_passive_abort_received(smc);
- release_sock(&smc->sk);
+ release_sock(sk);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&conn->tx_work);
- lock_sock(&smc->sk);
+ lock_sock(sk);
goto wakeup;
}
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
Powered by blists - more mailing lists