[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <912abe7c-3097-4d39-01b6-82385f001fa8@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:10:47 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
"Biju Das" <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] ravb: Add Rx checksum offload support
Hello!
On 11/23/21 4:31 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> TOE has hw support for calculating IP header checkum for IPV4 and
> TCP/UDP/ICMP checksum for both IPV4 and IPV6.
>
> This patch adds Rx checksum offload supported by TOE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 4 +++
> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> index a96552348e2d..d0e5eec0636e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
> #define RAVB_RXTSTAMP_TYPE_ALL 0x00000006
> #define RAVB_RXTSTAMP_ENABLED 0x00000010 /* Enable RX timestamping */
>
> +/* GbEthernet TOE hardware checksum values */
> +#define TOE_RX_CSUM_OK 0x0000
> +#define TOE_RX_CSUM_UNSUPPORTED 0xFFFF
These are hardly needed IMO.
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index c2b92c6a6cd2..2533e3401593 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -720,6 +720,33 @@ static void ravb_get_tx_tstamp(struct net_device *ndev)
> }
> }
>
> +static void ravb_rx_csum_gbeth(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + u32 csum_ip_hdr, csum_proto;
Why u32 if both sums are 16-bit?
> + u8 *hw_csum;
> +
> + /* The hardware checksum is contained in sizeof(__sum16) * 2 = 4 bytes
> + * appended to packet data. First 2 bytes is ip header csum and last
> + * 2 bytes is protocol csum.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(skb->len < sizeof(__sum16) * 2))
> + return;
> + hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - sizeof(__sum16);
> + csum_proto = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)get_unaligned_le16(hw_csum));
> +
> + hw_csum = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - 2 * sizeof(__sum16);
> + csum_ip_hdr = csum_unfold((__force __sum16)get_unaligned_le16(hw_csum));
> +
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + if (csum_proto == TOE_RX_CSUM_OK) {
> + if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP) && csum_ip_hdr == TOE_RX_CSUM_OK)
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> + else if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> + csum_ip_hdr == TOE_RX_CSUM_UNSUPPORTED)
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
Checksum is unsupported and you declare it unnecessary?
> + }
Now where's a call to skb_trim()?
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists