netdev - [PATCH net 6/9] tls: splice_read: fix accessing pre-processed records

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:25:54 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, davejwatson@...com,
        borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net,
        vakul.garg@....com, willemb@...gle.com, vfedorenko@...ek.ru,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net 6/9] tls: splice_read: fix accessing pre-processed records

recvmsg() will put peek()ed and partially read records onto the rx_list.
splice_read() needs to consult that list otherwise it may miss data.
Align with recvmsg() and also put partially-read records onto rx_list.
tls_sw_advance_skb() is pretty pointless now and will be removed in
net-next.

Fixes: 692d7b5d1f91 ("tls: Fix recvmsg() to be able to peek across multiple records")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
 net/tls/tls_sw.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 2f11f1db917a..d3e7ff90889e 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -2005,6 +2005,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	ssize_t copied = 0;
+	bool from_queue;
 	int err = 0;
 	long timeo;
 	int chunk;
@@ -2014,14 +2015,20 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 
 	timeo = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK);
 
-	skb = tls_wait_data(sk, NULL, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK, timeo, &err);
-	if (!skb)
-		goto splice_read_end;
+	from_queue = !skb_queue_empty(&ctx->rx_list);
+	if (from_queue) {
+		skb = __skb_dequeue(&ctx->rx_list);
+	} else {
+		skb = tls_wait_data(sk, NULL, flags & SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK, timeo,
+				    &err);
+		if (!skb)
+			goto splice_read_end;
 
-	err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, &chunk, &zc, false);
-	if (err < 0) {
-		tls_err_abort(sk, -EBADMSG);
-		goto splice_read_end;
+		err = decrypt_skb_update(sk, skb, NULL, &chunk, &zc, false);
+		if (err < 0) {
+			tls_err_abort(sk, -EBADMSG);
+			goto splice_read_end;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/* splice does not support reading control messages */
@@ -2037,7 +2044,17 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
 	if (copied < 0)
 		goto splice_read_end;
 
-	tls_sw_advance_skb(sk, skb, copied);
+	if (!from_queue) {
+		ctx->recv_pkt = NULL;
+		__strp_unpause(&ctx->strp);
+	}
+	if (chunk < rxm->full_len) {
+		__skb_queue_head(&ctx->rx_list, skb);
+		rxm->offset += len;
+		rxm->full_len -= len;
+	} else {
+		consume_skb(skb);
+	}
 
 splice_read_end:
 	release_sock(sk);
-- 
2.31.1