[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211125080638.33f02773@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:06:38 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Lahav Schlesinger <lschlesinger@...venets.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] rtnetlink: Support fine-grained netdevice
bulk deletion
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:47:13 +0200 Lahav Schlesinger wrote:
> +static int rtnl_list_dellink(struct net *net, void *ifindex_list, int size)
s/ifindex_list/ifindices/ ? it's not really a list
Can we make it an int pointer so we don't have to cast it later?
> +{
> + const int num_devices = size / sizeof(int);
> + struct net_device **dev_list;
> + LIST_HEAD(list_kill);
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + if (size < 0 || size % sizeof(int))
Does core reject size == 0? It won't be valid either.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev_list = kmalloc_array(num_devices, sizeof(*dev_list), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev_list)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_devices; i++) {
> + const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> +
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ((int *)ifindex_list)[i]);
> + if (!dev)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + ops = dev->rtnl_link_ops;
> + if (!ops || !ops->dellink)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + dev_list[i] = dev;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_devices; i++) {
> + const struct rtnl_link_ops *ops;
> + struct net_device *dev;
the temp variables are unnecessary here, the whole thing comfortably
fits on a line:
dev->rtnl_link_ops->dellink(dev_list[i], &list_kill);
> + dev = dev_list[i];
> + ops = dev->rtnl_link_ops;
> + ops->dellink(dev, &list_kill);
> + }
> +
> + unregister_netdevice_many(&list_kill);
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +
> +out_free:
> + kfree(dev_list);
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists