[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211124171839.09e31044@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:18:39 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
davem@...emloft.net, Denis Kirjanov <dkirjanov@...e.de>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] Bonding: add arp_missed_max option
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:18:53 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Currently, we use hard code number to verify if we are in the
> arp_interval timeslice. But some user may want to reduce/extend
> the verify timeslice. With the similar team option 'missed_max'
> the uers could change that number based on their own environment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
>
> ---
> v2: set IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX to NLA_U8, and limit the values to 1-255
> v3: rename the option name to arp_missed_max
Jay, looks good now?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists