[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1849b7a3-cdfe-f9dc-e4d1-172e8b1667d2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 08:32:18 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down
On 25.11.2021 01:46, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Adding Kalle and Hainer.
>
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 14:45:05 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:14:53 +0000
>> From: bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
>> To: stephen@...workplumber.org
>> Subject: [Bug 215129] New: Linux kernel hangs during power down
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215129
>>
>> Bug ID: 215129
>> Summary: Linux kernel hangs during power down
>> Product: Networking
>> Version: 2.5
>> Kernel Version: 5.15
>> Hardware: All
>> OS: Linux
>> Tree: Mainline
>> Status: NEW
>> Severity: normal
>> Priority: P1
>> Component: Other
>> Assignee: stephen@...workplumber.org
>> Reporter: martin.stolpe@...il.com
>> Regression: No
>>
>> Created attachment 299703
>> --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=299703&action=edit
>> Kernel log after timeout occured
>>
>> On my system the kernel is waiting for a task during shutdown which doesn't
>> complete.
>>
>> The commit which causes this behavior is:
>> [f32a213765739f2a1db319346799f130a3d08820] ethtool: runtime-resume netdev
>> parent before ethtool ioctl ops
>>
>> This bug causes also that the system gets unresponsive after starting Steam:
>> https://steamcommunity.com/app/221410/discussions/2/3194736442566303600/
>>
>
I think the reference to ath10k_pci is misleading, Kalle isn't needed here.
The actual issue is a RTNL deadlock in igb_resume(). See log snippet:
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: igb_resume+0xff/0x1e0 [igb 21bf6a00cb1f20e9b0e8434f7f8748a0504e93f8]
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xd0
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __rpm_callback+0x41/0x120
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: ? pci_pm_freeze_noirq+0x110/0x110
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_callback+0x35/0x70
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: rpm_resume+0x567/0x810
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: __pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x80
Nov 24 18:56:19 MartinsPc kernel: dev_ethtool+0xd4/0x2d80
We have at least two places in net core where runtime_resume() is called
under RTNL. This conflicts with the current structure in few Intel drivers
that have something like the following in their resume path.
rtnl_lock();
if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
err = __igb_open(netdev, true);
if (!err)
netif_device_attach(netdev);
rtnl_unlock();
Other drivers don't do this, so it's the question whether it's actually
needed here to take RTNL. Some discussion was started [0], but it ended
w/o tangible result and since then it has been surprisingly quiet.
[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg736880.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists