[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0fa74bfdfee95d6bba9fa49a5437f63c014f29ce.1637951641.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:34:21 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Steffen Froemer <sfroemer@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] tcp: fix page frag corruption on page fault
Steffen reported a TCP stream corruption for HTTP requests
served by the apache web-server using a cifs mount-point
and memory mapping the relevant file.
The root cause is quite similar to the one addressed by
commit 20eb4f29b602 ("net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from
memory reclaim"). Here the nested access to the task page frag
is caused by a page fault on the (mmapped) user-space memory
buffer coming from the cifs file.
The page fault handler performs an smb transaction on a different
socket, inside the same process context. Since sk->sk_allaction
for such socket does not prevent the usage for the task_frag,
the nested allocation modify "under the hood" the page frag
in use by the outer sendmsg call, corrupting the stream.
The overall relevant stack trace looks like the following:
httpd 78268 [001] 3461630.850950: probe:tcp_sendmsg_locked:
ffffffff91461d91 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x1
ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27
ffffffff9139814e sock_sendmsg+0x3e
ffffffffc06dfe1d smb_send_kvec+0x28
[...]
ffffffffc06cfaf8 cifs_readpages+0x213
ffffffff90e83c4b read_pages+0x6b
ffffffff90e83f31 __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1c1
ffffffff90e79e98 filemap_fault+0x788
ffffffff90eb0458 __do_fault+0x38
ffffffff90eb5280 do_fault+0x1a0
ffffffff90eb7c84 __handle_mm_fault+0x4d4
ffffffff90eb8093 handle_mm_fault+0xc3
ffffffff90c74f6d __do_page_fault+0x1ed
ffffffff90c75277 do_page_fault+0x37
ffffffff9160111e page_fault+0x1e
ffffffff9109e7b5 copyin+0x25
ffffffff9109eb40 _copy_from_iter_full+0xe0
ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0
ffffffff91462370 tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x5e0
ffffffff91462b57 tcp_sendmsg+0x27
ffffffff9139815c sock_sendmsg+0x4c
ffffffff913981f7 sock_write_iter+0x97
ffffffff90f2cc56 do_iter_readv_writev+0x156
ffffffff90f2dff0 do_iter_write+0x80
ffffffff90f2e1c3 vfs_writev+0xa3
ffffffff90f2e27c do_writev+0x5c
ffffffff90c042bb do_syscall_64+0x5b
ffffffff916000ad entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65
The cifs filesystem rightfully sets sk_allocations to GFP_NOFS,
we can avoid the nesting using the sk page frag for allocation
lacking the __GFP_FS flag. Do not define an additional mm-helper
for that, as this is strictly tied to the sk page frag usage.
v1 -> v2:
- use a stricted sk_page_frag() check instead of reordering the
code (Eric)
Reported-by: Steffen Froemer <sfroemer@...hat.com>
Fixes: 5640f7685831 ("net: use a per task frag allocator")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
---
include/net/sock.h | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index b32906e1ab55..715cdb4b2b79 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2430,19 +2430,22 @@ static inline void sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(struct sock *sk)
* @sk: socket
*
* Use the per task page_frag instead of the per socket one for
- * optimization when we know that we're in the normal context and owns
+ * optimization when we know that we're in process context and own
* everything that's associated with %current.
*
- * gfpflags_allow_blocking() isn't enough here as direct reclaim may nest
- * inside other socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
- * while it's already in use.
+ * Both direct reclaim and page faults can nest inside other
+ * socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
+ * while it's already in use: explicitly avoid task page_frag
+ * usage if the caller is potentially doing any of them.
+ * This assumes that page fault handlers use the GFP_NOFS flags.
*
* Return: a per task page_frag if context allows that,
* otherwise a per socket one.
*/
static inline struct page_frag *sk_page_frag(struct sock *sk)
{
- if (gfpflags_normal_context(sk->sk_allocation))
+ if ((sk->sk_allocation & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_MEMALLOC | __GFP_FS)) ==
+ (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_FS))
return ¤t->task_frag;
return &sk->sk_frag;
--
2.33.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists