[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211126205625.5c0e38c5@thinkpad>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:56:25 +0100
From: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>
To: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dsa: mv88e6xxx: make serdes SGMII/Fiber output
amplitude configurable
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:42:49 +0100
Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com> wrote:
> The mv88e6352, mv88e6240 and mv88e6176 have a serdes interface. This patch
> allows to configure the output swing to a desired value in the
> devicetree node of the switch.
>
> CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h | 3 +++
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/serdes.h | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index f00cbf5753b9..5182128959a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -3173,9 +3173,11 @@ static void mv88e6xxx_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> {
> struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
> + struct device_node *np = chip->dev->of_node;
> u8 cmode;
> int err;
> int i;
> + int out_amp;
Reverse christmas tree please, where possible.
struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
+ struct device_node *np = chip->dev->of_node;
+ int out_amp;
u8 cmode;
int err;
int
>
> chip->ds = ds;
> ds->slave_mii_bus = mv88e6xxx_default_mdio_bus(chip);
> @@ -3292,6 +3294,15 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> if (err)
> goto unlock;
>
> + if (chip->info->ops->serdes_set_out_amplitude && np) {
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "serdes-output-amplitude",
Hmm. Andrew, why don't we use <linux/property.h> instead of
<linux/of*.h> stuff in this dirver? Is there a reason or is this just
because it wasn't converted yet?
A simple device_property_read_u32() would be better here and we
wouldn't need the np pointer.
...
> +int mv88e6352_serdes_set_out_amplitude(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int val)
> +{
> + u16 reg;
> + int err;
> +
> + err = mv88e6352_serdes_read(chip, MV88E6352_SERDES_SPEC_CTRL2, ®);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + reg = (reg & MV88E6352_SERDES_OUT_AMP_MASK) | val;
> +
> + return mv88e6352_serdes_write(chip, MV88E6352_SERDES_SPEC_CTRL2, reg);
> +}
Is there a reason why we call this from driver probe instead of 6352's
serdes_power() ?
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists