[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaN/khA2eJJLgdte@shredder>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:09:38 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@...alicyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] ip route: save: exclude rtnh_flags which can't
be set
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 04:43:10PM +0300, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> + /*
> + * Exclude flags which can't be set directly
> + * by the userspace from the rtmsg dump.
> + */
I believe iproute2 is following netdev style comments [1] so this should
be:
/* Exclude flags which can't be set directly
* by the userspace from the rtmsg dump.
*/
At least it's consistent with other comments in the file.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.12/networking/netdev-FAQ.html#is-the-comment-style-convention-different-for-the-networking-content
> + r->rtm_flags &= ~RTNH_REJECT_MASK;
> +
> ret = write(STDOUT_FILENO, n, n->nlmsg_len);
> if ((ret > 0) && (ret != n->nlmsg_len)) {
> fprintf(stderr, "Short write while saving nlmsg\n");
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists