netdev - [PATCH net 08/10] wireguard: receive: drop handshakes if queue lock is contended

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211129153929.3457-9-Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:39:27 -0500
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Streun Fabio <fstreun@...dent.ethz.ch>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 08/10] wireguard: receive: drop handshakes if queue lock is contended

If we're being delivered packets from multiple CPUs so quickly that the
ring lock is contended for CPU tries, then it's safe to assume that the
queue is near capacity anyway, so just drop the packet rather than
spinning. This helps deal with multicore DoS that can interfere with
data path performance. It _still_ does not completely fix the issue, but
it again chips away at it.

Reported-by: Streun Fabio <fstreun@...dent.ethz.ch>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel")
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
index f4e537e3e8ec..7b8df406c773 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c
@@ -554,9 +554,19 @@ void wg_packet_receive(struct wg_device *wg, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_INITIATION):
 	case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_RESPONSE):
 	case cpu_to_le32(MESSAGE_HANDSHAKE_COOKIE): {
-		int cpu;
-		if (unlikely(!rng_is_initialized() ||
-			     ptr_ring_produce_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb))) {
+		int cpu, ret = -EBUSY;
+
+		if (unlikely(!rng_is_initialized()))
+			goto drop;
+		if (atomic_read(&wg->handshake_queue_len) > MAX_QUEUED_INCOMING_HANDSHAKES / 2) {
+			if (spin_trylock_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring.producer_lock)) {
+				ret = __ptr_ring_produce(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb);
+				spin_unlock_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring.producer_lock);
+			}
+		} else
+			ret = ptr_ring_produce_bh(&wg->handshake_queue.ring, skb);
+		if (ret) {
+	drop:
 			net_dbg_skb_ratelimited("%s: Dropping handshake packet from %pISpfsc\n",
 						wg->dev->name, skb);
 			goto err;
-- 
2.34.1