[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211129101712.0b74c2a8@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:17:12 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 00/10] wireguard/siphash patches for 5.16-rc6
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:39:19 -0500 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Here's quite a largeish set of stable patches I've had queued up and
> testing for a number of months now:
>
> - Patch (1) squelches a sparse warning by fixing an annotation.
> - Patches (2), (3), and (5) are minor improvements and fixes to the
> test suite.
> - Patch (4) is part of a tree-wide cleanup to have module-specific
> init and exit functions.
> - Patch (6) fixes a an issue with dangling dst references, by having a
> function to release references immediately rather than deferring,
> and adds an associated test case to prevent this from regressing.
> - Patches (7) and (8) help mitigate somewhat a potential DoS on the
> ingress path due to the use of skb_list's locking hitting contention
> on multiple cores by switching to using a ring buffer and dropping
> packets on contention rather than locking up another core spinning.
> - Patch (9) switches kvzalloc to kvcalloc for better form.
> - Patch (10) fixes alignment traps in siphash with clang-13 (and maybe
> other compilers) on armv6, by switching to using the unaligned
> functions by default instead of the aligned functions by default.
Typo in the subject, right? No particular connection to -rc6 here?
Just checking.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists