[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+Pk61q+7gxzhDEDgQBkcOhOLpx80QoiuDM2ceunFkqvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 09:44:38 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [net v3 2/3] net: sched: add check tc_skip_classify in sch egress
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 8:55 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> Try to resolve the issues as below:
> * We look up and then check tc_skip_classify flag in net
> sched layer, even though skb don't want to be classified.
> That case may consume a lot of cpu cycles.
>
> Install the rules as below:
> $ for id in $(seq 1 100); do
> $ tc filter add ... egress prio $id ... action mirred egress redirect dev ifb0
> $ done
>
> netperf:
> $ taskset -c 1 netperf -t TCP_RR -H ip -- -r 32,32
> $ taskset -c 1 netperf -t TCP_STREAM -H ip -- -m 32
>
> Before: 10662.33 tps, 108.95 Mbit/s
> After: 12434.48 tps, 145.89 Mbit/s
> For TCP_RR, there are 16.6% improvement, TCP_STREAM 33.9%.
These numbers mean nothing, really.
I think you should put 10,000 filters instead of 100 so that the
numbers look even better ?
As a matter of fact, you add yet another check in fast path.
For some reason I have not received the cover letter and patch 1/3.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists