[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKymbNQw3U5YhO_f8Aecon4KXbx9HvuZz=syc1LgOCT1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:55:33 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: split up filter.rst v2
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:32 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> for historical reasons filter.rst not only documents the classic Berkely
> Packet Filter, but also contains some of the most fundamental eBPF
> documentation. This series moves the actual eBPF documentation into newly
> created files under Documentation/bpf/ instead. Note that the instruction
> set document is still a bit of a mess due to all the references to classic
> BPF, but if this split goes through I plan to start on working to clean
> that up as well.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - rebased to the latest bpf-next
> - just refernence BPF instead of eBPF in most code
> - split the patches further up
> - better link the BPF documentation from filter.rst
Applied. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists