[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211202141144.GT427717@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:11:44 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Jεan Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
CC: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: xfrm: drop check of pols[0] for the second
time
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:03:12AM -0700, Jεan Sacren wrote:
> From: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
>
> !pols[0] is checked earlier. If we don't return, pols[0] is always
> true. We should drop the check of pols[0] for the second time and the
> binary is also smaller.
>
> Before:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 48395 957 240 49592 c1b8 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.o
>
> After:
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 48379 957 240 49576 c1a8 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.o
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
Applied to ipsec-next, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists