lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:57:04 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Vladimir Oltean' <olteanv@...il.com>
CC:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: optimize skb_postpull_rcsum()

From: Vladimir Oltean
> Sent: 02 December 2021 21:40
...
> >
> > Try replacing both ~ with -.
> > So replace:
> > 		skb->csum = ~csum_partial(start, len, ~skb->csum);
> > with:
> > 		skb->csum = -csum_partial(start, len, -skb->csum);
> >
> > That should geneate ~0u instead 0 (if I've got my maths right).
> 
> Indeed, replacing both one's complement operations with two's complement
> seems to produce correct results (consistent with old code) in all cases
> that I am testing with (ICMP, TCP, UDP). Thanks!

You need to generate (or persuade Eric to generate) a patch.
I don't have the right source tree.

Any code that does ~csum_partial() is 'dubious' unless followed
by a check for 0.
The two's compliment negate save the conditional - provided the
offset of 1 can be added in earlier.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ