lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yast4PrQGGLxDrCy@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 4 Dec 2021 08:59:12 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 05/12] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: convert to
 phylink_generic_validate()

On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 08:18:22PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/3/21 12:03 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 11/24/21 9:52 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > Populate the supported interfaces and MAC capabilities for the bcm_sf2
> > > DSA switch and remove the old validate implementation to allow DSA to
> > > use phylink_generic_validate() for this switch driver.
> > > 
> > > The exclusion of Gigabit linkmodes for MII and Reverse MII links is
> > > handled within phylink_generic_validate() in phylink, so there is no
> > > need to make them conditional on the interface mode in the driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> > 
> > but it looks like the fixed link ports are reporting some pretty strange
> > advertisement values one of my two platforms running the same kernel image:
> 
> We would want to amend your patch with something that caters a bit more
> towards how the ports have been configured:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> index d6ef0fb0d943..88933c3feddd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> @@ -675,12 +675,18 @@ static u32 bcm_sf2_sw_get_phy_flags(struct
> dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>  static void bcm_sf2_sw_get_caps(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>                                 struct phylink_config *config)
>  {
> -       __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII, config->supported_interfaces);
> -       __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_REVMII, config->supported_interfaces);
> -       __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII, config->supported_interfaces);
> -       __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> -       __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MOCA, config->supported_interfaces);
> -       phy_interface_set_rgmii(config->supported_interfaces);
> +       struct bcm_sf2_priv *priv = bcm_sf2_to_priv(ds);
> +
> +       if (priv->int_phy_mask & BIT(port))
> +               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> +       else if (priv->moca_port == port)
> +               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MOCA,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> +       else {
> +               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> +               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_REVMII,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> +               __set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII,
> config->supported_interfaces);
> +               phy_interface_set_rgmii(config->supported_interfaces);
> +       }
> 
>         config->mac_capabilities = MAC_ASYM_PAUSE | MAC_SYM_PAUSE |
>                 MAC_10 | MAC_100 | MAC_1000;

That's fine, thanks for the update.

> Now, with respect to the fixed link ports reporting 1000baseKX/Full this is
> introduced by switching to your patch, it works before and it "breaks"
> after.
> 
> The first part that is a bit weird is that we seem to be calling
> phylink_generic_validate() twice in a row from the same call site.
> 
> For fixed link ports, instead of masking with what the fixed link actually
> supports, we seem to be using a supported mask which is all 1s which seems a
> bit excessive for a fixed link.
> 
> This is an excerpt with the internal PHY:
> 
> [    4.210890] brcm-sf2 f0b00000.ethernet_switch gphy (uninitialized):
> Calling phylink_generic_validate
> [    4.220063] before phylink_get_linkmodes: 0000000,00000000,00010fc0
> [    4.226357] phylink_get_linkmodes: caps: 0xffffffff mac_capabilities:
> 0xff
> [    4.233258] after phylink_get_linkmodes: c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.239463] before anding supported with mask: 0000000,00000000,000062ff
> [    4.246189] after anding supported with mask: 0000000,00000000,000062ff
> [    4.252829] before anding advertising with mask:
> c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.259729] after anding advertising with mask: c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.266546] brcm-sf2 f0b00000.ethernet_switch gphy (uninitialized): PHY
> [f0b403c0.mdio--1:05] driver [Broadcom BCM7445] (irq=POLL)
> 
> and this is what a fixed link port looks like:
> 
> [    4.430765] brcm-sf2 f0b00000.ethernet_switch rgmii_2 (uninitialized):
> Calling phylink_generic_validate
> [    4.440205] before phylink_get_linkmodes: 0000000,00000000,00010fc0
> [    4.446500] phylink_get_linkmodes: caps: 0xff mac_capabilities: 0xff
> [    4.452880] after phylink_get_linkmodes: c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.459085] before anding supported with mask: fffffff,ffffffff,ffffffff
> [    4.465811] after anding supported with mask: c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.472450] before anding advertising with mask:
> c000018,00000200,00036fff
> [    4.479349] after anding advertising with mask: c000018,00000200,00036fff
> 
> or maybe the problem is with phylink_get_ksettings... ran out of time
> tonight to look further into it.

It will be:

        s = phy_lookup_setting(pl->link_config.speed, pl->link_config.duplex,
                               pl->supported, true);
        linkmode_zero(pl->supported);
        phylink_set(pl->supported, MII);
        phylink_set(pl->supported, Pause);
        phylink_set(pl->supported, Asym_Pause);
        phylink_set(pl->supported, Autoneg);
        if (s) {
                __set_bit(s->bit, pl->supported);
                __set_bit(s->bit, pl->link_config.lp_advertising);

Since 1000baseKX_Full is set in the supported mask, phy_lookup_setting()
returns the first entry it finds in the supported table:

        /* 1G */
        PHY_SETTING(   1000, FULL,   1000baseKX_Full            ),
        PHY_SETTING(   1000, FULL,   1000baseT_Full             ),
        PHY_SETTING(   1000, HALF,   1000baseT_Half             ),
        PHY_SETTING(   1000, FULL,   1000baseT1_Full            ),
        PHY_SETTING(   1000, FULL,   1000baseX_Full             ),

Consequently, 1000baseKX_Full is preferred over 1000baseT_Full.

Fixed links don't specify their underlying technology, only the speed
and duplex, so going from speed and duplex to an ethtool link mode is
not easy. I suppose we could drop 1000baseKX_Full from the supported
bitmap in phylink_parse_fixedlink() before the first phylink_validate()
call. Alternatively, the table could be re-ordered. It was supposed to
be grouped by speed and sorted in descending match priority as specified
by the comment above the table. Does it really make sense that
1000baseKX_Full is supposed to be preferred over all the other 1G
speeds? I suppose that's a question for Tom Lendacky
<thomas.lendacky@....com>, who introduced this in 3e7077067e80
("phy: Expand phy speed/duplex settings array") back in 2014.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ