netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 05/12] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: convert to phylink_generic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 4 Dec 2021 16:01:32 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 05/12] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: convert to
 phylink_generic_validate()

> The order of 1000baseKX/Full and 1000baseT/Full is such that we
> prefer 1000baseKX/Full over 1000baseT/Full, but 1000baseKX/Full is
> a lot rarer than 1000baseT/Full, and thus is much less likely to
> be preferred.
> 
> This causes phylink problems - it means a fixed link specifying a
> speed of 1G and full duplex gets an ethtool linkmode of 1000baseKX/Full
> rather than 1000baseT/Full as would be expected - and since we offer
> userspace a software emulation of a conventional copper PHY, we want
> to offer copper modes in preference to anything else. However, we do
> still want to allow the rarer modes as well.

2.5G already places T before X, so it makes it more uniform with that.

For 10G, T comes last. Maybe we should also consider this case?  Do we
see more 10G copper than fibre/backplane?

    Andrew