[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c0bfb9ad40ed3da0edf905e226f13ef4cf1adb4.1638814614.git.gnault@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 19:22:09 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Russell Strong <russell@...ong.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/4] ipv4: Stop taking ECN bits into account in
ip4-rules
Use the new dscp_t type to replace the tos field of fib4_rule, so that
ip4-rules consistently ignore ECN bits.
Before this patch, ip4-rules did accept rules with the high order ECN
bit set (but not the low order one). Also, it relied on its callers
masking the ECN bits of ->flowi4_tos to prevent those from influencing
the result. This was brittle and a few call paths still do the lookup
without masking the ECN bits first.
After this patch ip4-rules only compare the DSCP bits. ECN can't
influence the result anymore, even if the caller didn't mask these
bits. Also, ip4-rules now must have both ECN bits cleared or they will
be rejected.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
---
net/ipv4/fib_rules.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
index d279cb8ac158..d4529350a2e8 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_rules.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <net/inet_dscp.h>
#include <net/ip.h>
#include <net/route.h>
#include <net/tcp.h>
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ struct fib4_rule {
struct fib_rule common;
u8 dst_len;
u8 src_len;
- u8 tos;
+ dscp_t dscp;
__be32 src;
__be32 srcmask;
__be32 dst;
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ static bool fib4_rule_matchall(const struct fib_rule *rule)
{
struct fib4_rule *r = container_of(rule, struct fib4_rule, common);
- if (r->dst_len || r->src_len || r->tos)
+ if (r->dst_len || r->src_len || r->dscp)
return false;
return fib_rule_matchall(rule);
}
@@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int fib4_rule_match(struct fib_rule *rule,
((daddr ^ r->dst) & r->dstmask))
return 0;
- if (r->tos && (r->tos != fl4->flowi4_tos))
+ if (r->dscp && r->dscp != inet_dsfield_to_dscp(fl4->flowi4_tos))
return 0;
if (rule->ip_proto && (rule->ip_proto != fl4->flowi4_proto))
@@ -230,10 +231,11 @@ static int fib4_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
int err = -EINVAL;
struct fib4_rule *rule4 = (struct fib4_rule *) rule;
- if (frh->tos & ~IPTOS_TOS_MASK) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid tos");
+ if (!inet_validate_dscp(frh->tos)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid dsfield (tos): ECN bits must be 0");
goto errout;
}
+ rule4->dscp = inet_dsfield_to_dscp(frh->tos);
/* split local/main if they are not already split */
err = fib_unmerge(net);
@@ -275,7 +277,6 @@ static int fib4_rule_configure(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
rule4->srcmask = inet_make_mask(rule4->src_len);
rule4->dst_len = frh->dst_len;
rule4->dstmask = inet_make_mask(rule4->dst_len);
- rule4->tos = frh->tos;
net->ipv4.fib_has_custom_rules = true;
@@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int fib4_rule_compare(struct fib_rule *rule, struct fib_rule_hdr *frh,
if (frh->dst_len && (rule4->dst_len != frh->dst_len))
return 0;
- if (frh->tos && (rule4->tos != frh->tos))
+ if (frh->tos && inet_dscp_to_dsfield(rule4->dscp) != frh->tos)
return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_CLASSID
@@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ static int fib4_rule_fill(struct fib_rule *rule, struct sk_buff *skb,
frh->dst_len = rule4->dst_len;
frh->src_len = rule4->src_len;
- frh->tos = rule4->tos;
+ frh->tos = inet_dscp_to_dsfield(rule4->dscp);
if ((rule4->dst_len &&
nla_put_in_addr(skb, FRA_DST, rule4->dst)) ||
--
2.21.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists