lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Dec 2021 22:32:01 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Emmanuel Deloget <emmanuel.deloget@....link>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Louis Amas <louis.amas@....link>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 1/1] net: mvpp2: fix XDP rx queues registering

On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:14:38PM +0100, Emmanuel Deloget wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 06/12/2021 21:55, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon,  6 Dec 2021 18:22:19 +0100 Louis Amas wrote:
> > > The registration of XDP queue information is incorrect because the
> > > RX queue id we use is invalid. When port->id == 0 it appears to works
> > > as expected yet it's no longer the case when port->id != 0.
> > > 
> > > The problem arised while using a recent kernel version on the
> > > MACCHIATOBin. This board has several ports:
> > >   * eth0 and eth1 are 10Gbps interfaces ; both ports has port->id == 0;
> > >   * eth2 is a 1Gbps interface with port->id != 0.
> > 
> > Still doesn't apply to net/master [1]. Which tree is it based on?
> > Perhaps you are sending this for the BPF tree? [2] Hm, doesn't apply
> > there either...
> > 
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/
> > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/
> 
> Strange...
> 
> AFAIK the commit was added on top of net/master (as cloned at approximately
> 17:30 CET). I'll check with Louis tomorrow morning. We may have messed-up
> something.

The reason it doesn't apply is because something is butchering the
whitespace. Whatever it is, it thinks it knows better than you do,
and is converting the tabs in the patch to a series of space
characters. Your email also appears to be using quoted-printable
encoding.

It looks like you're using git-send-email - and that should be fine.
It also looks like you're sending through a MS Exchange server...
My suspicion would be that the MS Exchange server is re-encoding
to quoted-printable and is butchering the white space, but that's
just a guess. I've no idea what you can do about that.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ