netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] mptcp: support TCP_CORK and TCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211207101920.GB30918@breakpoint.cc>
Date:   Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:19:20 +0100
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Galaganov <max@...ernet.ru>,
        davem@...emloft.net, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
        mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] mptcp: support TCP_CORK and TCP_NODELAY

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri,  3 Dec 2021 14:35:41 -0800 Mat Martineau wrote:
> > +static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_tcp_nodelay(struct mptcp_sock *msk, sockptr_t optval,
> > +					    unsigned int optlen)
> > +{
> > +	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> > +	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> > +	int val;
> > +
> > +	if (optlen < sizeof(int))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (copy_from_sockptr(&val, optval, sizeof(val)))
> > +		return -EFAULT;
> 
> Should we check that optval is not larger than sizeof(int) or if it is
> that the rest of the buffer is zero? Or for the old school options we
> should stick to the old school behavior?

My intent was to stick to tcp behaviour, i.e. no check on > sizeof(int)
or on "extra buffer" content.