[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fac880302f38aa66a5e593c03dc3e06b329c33e9.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 11:30:42 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
davem@...emloft.net, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/10] mptcp: add SIOCINQ, OUTQ and OUTQNSD
ioctls
Hello,
On Mon, 2021-12-06 at 17:16 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:35:34 -0800 Mat Martineau wrote:
> > + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + lock_sock(sk);
> > + __mptcp_move_skbs(msk);
> > + answ = mptcp_inq_hint(sk);
> > + release_sock(sk);
>
> The raciness is not harmful here?
Thank you for the careful review!
AFAICS the race between the socket state test and the receive queue
lenght estimate is not harmful: if a socket is concurrently
disconnected and moved to a listen status, mptcp_inq_hint() will return
0, as plain TCP would do in the same scenario - all the fields accessed
by __mptcp_move_skbs() and mptcp_inq_hint() will be in a consistant
status (modulo unknown bugs).
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists